Create New Share
Please enter the email address below of the person you would like to share this article with.
An email will be sent to the recipient with a link to this chosen article.
A source for healthcare professionals to access the latest data and information on the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with gut related disorders
Professor Julian R.F. Walters
Consultant Gastroenterologist and Professor of Gastroenterology, Imperial College London, London, UK
Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) has been known historically as bile acid malabsorption (BAM). In patients with ileal disease or resection, BAD is secondary to malabsorption of bile acids, and this is also the case in certain other gastrointestinal disorders and after cholecystectomy. However, in the case of diarrhoea due to primary or idiopathic BAD, an obvious defect in absorption of bile acids is usually not observed. Instead in these cases, there is often greater bile acid synthesis; this overproduction results in greater concentrations of bile acids entering the colon, leading to diarrhoea.1
The synthesis of bile acids in the liver is regulated by negative feedback via fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19), produced in the ileum.2 Defects in the production of FGF19 could explain the pathology of primary BAD. It has been observed that serum FGF19 levels are lower in patients with BAD, compared to those without the disease (p<0.0001).3 In support of this proposed mechanism, it has been shown that low FGF19 levels in patients with BAD are related to increased bile acid synthesis, as measured by assay of the bile acid precursor, 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one.4
A prospective study analysed a large patient group with chronic diarrhoea. Those with SeHCAT retention values >15% were used as controls and compared with patients with BAD, who had SeHCAT retention values ≤15%. Subgroup analyses looked at those with severe (SeHCAT <5%), moderate (SeHCAT 5–10%) and mild (SeHCAT 10–15%) BAD. The results showed a significant difference in the median FGF19 value in the patients with BAD compared with that in the control patients without BAD (p<0.006).4 In an analysis of the clinical features in the primary BAD group, the predominance of women was lower in the BAD group than in the control group. The groups were difficult to separate on clinical grounds, although the median number of daily stools in the primary BAD group (6/day) was slightly more than in controls or secondary BAD groups. The median duration of diarrhoea was 24 months in the primary BAD group. This study additionally revealed that low FGF19 values were predictive of the response to the various bile acid sequestrants.4
Job number: JB57410GBl Date of Preparation: June 2019
You must be registered to GutNews.org
to view or download these files
Brief report: length of ileal resection correlates with severity of bile acid malabsorption in Crohn’s disease
In patients with Crohn’s disease who had a prior surgical resection there was a modest correlation between the length of ileal resection and the severity of bile acid malabsorption (BAM), as defined by tauroselcholic (75selenium) acid (SeHCAT) retention values. Response to bile salt sequestrant therapy was not dependent on SeHCAT retention values.
Are you a healthcare professional?
This educational website is developed by GE Healthcare for educational purposes. The information contained within this website is intended for healthcare professionals. By entering this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
This link opens another website that is not under the review or control of GE Healthcare Ltd and, as such, the company does not endorse the content, its accuracy, or any practices or standards contained within it.